State and Revolution, Part 2
Lenin, shortly after the Revolution
The State
This part of our course on
“The State and Revolution” comprises of Lenin’s lecture, “The State” (download linked below).
This lecture was given in July, 1919, two years after the writing of “The State
and Revolution”, and less than two years after the Great October 1917
revolution. It can help us to revise quickly the main considerations of the
State and what that thing really is, as a partial preparation for study of the
earlier work, which ranges much wider.
In “Bourgeois and Proletarians”, the first section of the Communist Manifesto,
Karl Marx wrote:
“The
executive of the modern state is but a committee for managing the common
affairs of the whole bourgeoisie.”
In other words: The modern
State is the executive committee of the ruling bourgeois class, of which there
is not, and cannot be, any other such ruling executive committee or totalising
authority.
The State manifests itself in
many ways. Not only is it Legislature, Executive and Judiciary, but it also
includes the “Special Bodies of Armed Men” (police, intelligence and military),
the “sovereign document” of the Constitution, the State Owned Enterprises, and
the “Delivery” departments like Education, Health, Public Works; and others.
Concerning the state, in his
speech to the COSATU Central Committee on 28 July 2011, SACP General Secretary
Dr Blade Nzimande said:
“There is a
distinction but very close relationship between ‘government’ and the ‘state’.
Government represents the highest most concentration of the power of the state,
but government does not constitute the entirety of the state. The state is made
up of its executive arm (Cabinet and the bureaucracy), the legislature(s) and
the judiciary, as well as other organs of state. As to who the executive arm of
the state and the composition of parliament is largely determined through electoral
means, but the totality of the character and nature of the state is not
principally determined by elections, but instead by the balance of class forces
in broader society. It is therefore possible, as I will illustrate later in the
speech, that a particular party can win elections, but at the same time its
views and interests not be the dominant ones in the state. In 1994 we inherited
an apartheid state apparatus, that we have not smashed entirely, and key
components of the apartheid state still reflects itself in the bureaucracy, the
judiciary and in various other areas of the state, not least the ideological
orientation of the state organs.”
As communists we hold fast to
the concept of the State as the instrument of class power that enforces and perpetuates
bourgeois class dictatorship in our country. We do not believe that the State
is neutral, or above class struggle. The State is the principal instrument of
class struggle on behalf of the ruling bourgeois class.
We intend that there should
as soon as possible be no class division and therefore that the State as we
know it would become redundant and give way to social self-management, or in
other words, to communism – true freedom.
Yet the term “State” is
nowadays used in other, less strict senses, and we as political people who must
communicate with others, do also use the word in other senses than the above.
For example, we sometimes use the phrase “Developmental State”, which even if
we ourselves would qualify its meaning, is nevertheless widely understood as
meaning a State that is equally beneficial to all classes (i.e. is a “win-win”,
or classless, or neutral state).
We are fortunate to have the
lecture that Lenin [pictured] gave to students in Moscow in 1919 on
this topic, wherein Lenin asks:
“what is the state, how did it arise and fundamentally
what attitude to the state should be displayed by the party of the working
class, which is fighting for the complete overthrow of capitalism - the
Communist Party?”
Lenin referred his audience to Engels’ “Origin
of the Family, Private Property and the State”. This book of Engels’ sweeps through the whole human
story and explains the fall of the women, as well as class struggle and the
state. We will take it as our next part, and then, for the fuller treatment
from Lenin, there is the extraordinary work that he produced between the two
Russian revolutions of February and October, 1917: “The State and Revolution”,
Chapter 1 of which will be our fourth part of this course.
·
The above is to
introduce the original reading-text: Lecture on The State, 1919, Lenin.
