Hegel,
Part 7
|
|
Ref.
|
Ten-Part Course:
|
Booklets
|
|
|
|
11
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
11
|
|
The 16 Courses
of the CU
The
Philosophy of Right
In the second
paragraph of his Preface to the
Philosophy of Right (download linked below) Hegel wrote:
“A compendium
proper, like a science, has its subject-matter accurately laid out … its chief
task is to arrange the essential phases of its material.”
This much can apply
to our “Communist
University”, in relation to this course on Hegel, and to the other 15
courses (see above for the full “compendium”).
But Hegel wants to emphasise
where his own compendium becomes the exception to the general rule, so in the
next paragraph he says:
“This
treatise differs from the ordinary compendium mainly in its method of
procedure. It must be understood at the outset that the philosophic way of advancing from one matter to another, the
general speculative method, which is
the only kind of scientific proof available in philosophy, is essentially
different from every other… True, the logical rules, such as those of
definition, classification, and inference are now generally recognised to be inadequate for speculative science.
Perhaps it is nearer the mark to say that the inadequacy of the rules has been
felt rather than recognised, because they have been counted as mere fetters,
and thrown aside to make room for free speech from the heart, fancy and random
intuition… In my Science of Logic I have developed the nature of speculative science in
detail.”
Hegel says that he is now going to apply this new kind of Logic in
his new book on the Philosophy of Right, of which this document is the Preface.
Is it the Philosophy of Right and Wrong? Or is it the Philosophy
of Rights, as in “Human Rights”? You be the judge.
When reading Marx’s Capital, we too are apt, like Hegel’s
contemporaries, to “fall back
upon the old-fashioned method of inference and formal reasoning”, i.e. the pre-Hegel method. Whereas Marx is using the
Hegel method, so that if we are not aware, then we may be seriously baffled by
some of what Marx is arguing as he “advances from one thing to another”.
This is why we study
Hegel in the first place: So as the better to understand Marx.
The linked document of Hegel’s is readable and full of good things
to discuss. Therefore it can stand as a discussion text without more elaboration.
But one thing that we can usefully say at this moment is that
Hegel is clearly investigating, as a philosopher, how it is that people's minds
become made up about things, both as individuals and as society, and how it is
that minds are later changed again. This is how politics is done. Hegel’s work
is of direct, practical interest to political people.
“The ingenuous mind adheres with simple
conviction to the truth which is publicly acknowledged. On this foundation it
builds its conduct and way of life. In opposition to this naive view of things
rises the supposed difficulty of detecting amidst the endless differences of
opinion anything of universal application.”
In the next instalment of this part we will take one more of Andy
Blunden’s lectures, and in the next part, take the remaining three of Andy’s
lectures, for what is in them that can help us with Marx.
In the final two lectures we will look at other commentaries and
relevant texts, including from Evald Ilyenkov, Vladimir Ilyich Lenin, and Ron
Press.
·
The above is to introduce the original reading-text: Preface to the Philosophy of
Right, 1820, Hegel.
